Advertisement
 
Monday, July 25, 2016
Amsterdam, NY ,

 

Advertisement

In the name of vengeance

Wednesday, May 22, 2013 - Updated: 3:10 PM

No matter how often Republicans denounce them, the initial talking points used by the White House to describe the attack in Benghazi, Libya are not the real point. But they have become a major political issue in large part because of the White House's inept response to questions about how they were written.

In every administration, talking points -- officially sanctioned comments -- are massaged and fought over by any agency with a stake in the outcome. It is also true that the details of crises often take time to sort out; we now know the attack that killed Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three others were carried out by Al Qaeda-linked groups, though at least initially, that was unclear.

The Republicans recently pressed on against President Obama and former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, citing e-mails to suggest the administration tried to cover up the link to terrorism. There is little doubt that the White House could have handled the talking points issue better. Press Secretary Jay Carney said that the CIA rewrote the talking points when, in fact, e-mails showed the State Department played a substantial role. But both Obama and Clinton have accepted responsibility for the security failures and a State Department inquiry board in November called for reforms to correct those problems.

That hasn't stopped the Republicans from seeking to name a special investigative commission. Republican-led committees in the House have already held numerous hearings on Benghazi, and produced no blockbuster revelations. And Clinton has testified before the Senate on this matter in January. Even so, Republicans are trying to justify having a new commission by discrediting the State Department inquiry. It was surprising that the board did not question Clinton or her two top deputies because, as Thomas Pickering, the former diplomat who co-chaired the inquiry explained, the board concluded mistakes were made by less senior officials.

There are serious issues that need follow-up, including the CIA's role in responding to the Benghazi attacks, stability in Libya, which is in disarray, and the status of diplomatic security reforms. But none of that seems to concern Republicans who are out for political vengeance.

-- The New York Times

     

Comments made about this article - 0 Total

Comment on this article

Advertisement
Subscribe to The Recorder

 

The Recorder Sports Schedule

Most Popular

    MCSPCA rescues cats from hoarding situation
    Friday, July 22, 2016

    Four arrested for drug possession in Amsterdam
    Tuesday, July 19, 2016

    County tackles staffing, overtime in sheriff's office
    Wednesday, July 20, 2016

    Students urge GASD board to reconsider termination of AHS Spanish teacher
    Thursday, July 21, 2016

    Amsterdam loses bid for $10M state grant
    Wednesday, July 20, 2016

    Daniel J. 'Pucky' Agresta
    Friday, July 22, 2016

    Generator project breaking ground in Amsterdam
    Tuesday, July 19, 2016

    City man sentenced in crash that killed three
    Tuesday, July 19, 2016

    Amsterdam is still a great place to live
    Tuesday, July 19, 2016

    Warren P. Roosevelt Sr.
    Saturday, July 23, 2016

Advertisement

Copyright © McClary Media, Inc.

Privacy Policies: The Recorder

Contact Us

Twitter

Instagram

Facebook