Wednesday, December 07, 2016
Amsterdam, NY ,



Turn cameras back on in court

Saturday, March 16, 2013 - Updated: 4:31 PM

During a 10-year period, from 1987-97, New York state conducted a series of experimental programs in which judges were allowed to authorize the use of audio and visual recording equipment when it came to covering court proceedings.

During that time, there was no evidence that an unobtrusive presence of a camera during trials caused any miscarriage of justice, even though there's long been concern that judges and lawyers would be unable to control themselves and start grandstanding during proceedings.

Unfortunately, in 1997, the state legislature refused to renew the programs, and the lens caps have largely been put back on the cameras. There are instances when judges have allowed cameras into their courtrooms, but those instances have been rare.

New York Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman is proposing to restore the rights of journalists to begin covering court proceedings with audiovisual proceedings. We support Lippman's decision; cameras should be allowed back in courtrooms.

We understand the need to keep proceedings calm and orderly. In Montgomery County's recent double-murder trial, the defendant, Ivan Ramos, who was convicted of the crimes, had a few outbursts and disrupted the process at times.

However, those situations were quickly squashed, mainly because the judge presiding over the case maintained control of the courtroom. We doubt the presence of a camera would have made matters worse.

Courts at any level belong to the public, and as such, the public should have a right to know what happens during trials and hearings. Because of capacity issues, the use of audio and visual recording equipment gives people increased access to the court system.

We believe judges should have some say when it comes to using cameras in courts. Judge have a right to instruct journalists to not record images of jurors and other parts of proceedings that will disrupt the process. Everyone has the right to a fair trial, and we would never support anything that would take that away.

Judges already allow -- albeit rarely -- still photography during proceedings, and there haven't been many instances of those cameras stopping the wheels of justice from turning. Granted, the presence of video recording equipment is more noticeable, but judges and lawyers should be professional enough to not let that distract from the task at hand. If they can't control themselves when the cameras are on, maybe they shouldn't hold those jobs in the first place.

The state should reauthorize the use of cameras in courts. Anything that gives the public greater access to their government -- which includes the judicial branch -- can only open the door to greater transparency when it comes to conducting the public's business.


Comments made about this article - 0 Total

Comment on this article

Subscribe to The Recorder


The Recorder Sports Schedule

Most Popular

    'Beasts' star Redmayne discusses his role, career
    Thursday, December 01, 2016

    Joseph M. Lemanski
    Thursday, December 01, 2016

    Alexandria "Alex" Carter
    Thursday, December 01, 2016

    Fedullo, Pritchard lead AHS past Nisky, 53-34
    Thursday, December 01, 2016

    Donald Gary Desorbo (Don)
    Friday, December 02, 2016

    Percy E. Tallmadge
    Thursday, December 01, 2016

    Lady Rams show promise both on and off the court
    Friday, December 02, 2016

    B-P fundraiser to aid other countries get drinking water
    Thursday, December 01, 2016

    Amsterdam drops 60-50 decision to Green Tech
    Saturday, December 03, 2016

    David Edward Hughes
    Saturday, December 03, 2016


Copyright © McClary Media, Inc.

Privacy Policies: The Recorder

Contact Us